hollyanderic.com

Nope, we didn't register it. We've sort of decided not to do our own wedding website, although that was based on theoretical cost and effort and it might not actually be that expensive or effort-full, so we'll see. We haven't set up a free website, either, yet, but that's beside the point right now.

If you would, please open up a new tab (or window, if you're not using Firefox or even the newest version of IE), and click on over to hollyanderic.com. And then click on "wedding."

There's another set of us?!!?!? And Eric actually knows the other Eric -- they're from the same part of Pennsylvania and went to high school together, apparently. I do not know the other Holly. But they got married in Princeton (Massachusetts) and I'm from Princeton (New Jersey), which is near Worcester (Massachusetts), which is where my dad did his reserve training the whole time we lived in Princeton, NJ, and where my good friend (and bridesmaid, although she doesn't know it yet) Karen lives with her husband and their new daughter, Lily (the prettiest newborn baby I've ever seen in my life).

Talk about crazy coincidences! And grr to them for stealing our domain name.

What do you think about ericandholly.com? We both think it sounds better the other way around, but it looks like that's not an option. Thehollyanderic.com? (It's available and suggested!) hollyeric.com, or maybe holly-eric.com?

These are not necessarily serious inquiries for your opinion. We may do nothing at all.

Target Bridal?!!!!

Sorry for two posts in a row, but when I pulled that picture of my Target shoes off the Target website, I found this:

Target Bridal

Wedding dresses by Isaac Mizrahi (for less than $200!!), bridesmaid dresses, tuxes by Merona for $190 (jacket, pants, and tux shirt), veils and headpieces, and "regular" Target items like shoes and accessories pulled from the other parts of their website.

WOW! My favorite store just got more awesome.

I bought shoes... already?!?!?!

I wrote the post below last week, but never published it. I thought I would wait and maybe check out some more shoes first.

Then I went to Target on Saturday. And bought these:


Only $19.99 -- how could I resist? They're totally cute, tall enough (we did a test dance in the Target shoe section), and definitely able to be worn again. Or even before the wedding...


I might keep looking. Or I might not.






~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Original, unpublished post:

I went to Off-Broadway Shoes last week and found these candidates:

Kenneth Cole Reaction -- "Rags to Riches," silver, 3" heel












Steve Madden -- "Martha," purple (but I can only find a picture of it in black), 4" heel












And finally, a GREAT pair of purple pumps by Michael Shannon, style name "Anna," which seems to be a discount brand that only Off-Broadway Shoes carries, which means they do not exist on the internet at all apparently, but they were ADORABLE. If you see an Off-Broadway Shoes commercial, they're the first pair they show -- peep toe with striped purple fabric... hard to explain, but very cute. And I think because they are so difficult to find, I might just have to buy them. Sigh.

Check out what Target has!
Isaac Mizrahi for Target -- Laurel, silver, 3.5" heel. I can't usually wear slingbacks, though -- they always slip off. They do share their name with my sister, though.












Mossimo -- Heulwen, silver, 3" heel












Mossimo -- Hailey, silver, 4" heel -- a very strong candidate, and only $19.99! Also a slingback, though.













The Nordstrom's website offers a few candidates as well:
Nina -- Gordie, true silver or deep plum, 3.5" heel












Calvin Klein -- Riza, silver satin, 3.5" heel













Nina and Chinese Laundry have many other options as well.

I'm not hard to please -- a tall, strappy sandal with a d'Orsay heel or ankle strap in silver or purple is all I need. Thankfully, price constraints are going to make these decisions much easier.

A Bride Sues Her Florist Over Pastel Hydrangeas

Wow, brides ARE crazy.

A NYC bride has sued her florist for breach of contract for a "series of faux pas at her wedding on Aug. 11." "In the most 'egregious,' ... the florist substituted pastel pink and green hydrangeas for the dark rust and green hydrangeas she had specified for 22 centerpieces."

Wow.

I guess when you pay over $27,000 for your flowers you'd better get what you want. I'm going to ignore for the moment the idea of paying $27,000 for flowers -- even in NYC.

I guess I should use this opportunity to announce that I intend to do some of my own wedding flowers. Not all of them. Just some. There are plenty of places to order wholesale flowers from, and I definitely have the ability to do centerpieces and some bouquets. I could do boutonnières also, but I'm not totally crazy, don't worry. There are some logistical issues to consider: when you order flowers wholesale, they're closed and you need to give them a few days in a cool place to open -- florists use walk-in refrigerators, which I don't have. One solution is a ceremony/reception site that will let me use their catering refrigerators, but it depends on the site. Anyway, these are issues for many months from now, but I am excited at the prospect of getting to play with flowers again.

Shoes

You definitely need to have your wedding shoes before you get your dress altered. But me? I think I need my shoes before I even buy my dress.

At 5'1", I'm on the short side of things. I like wearing all types of shoes, flat and heeled alike. Eric, on the other hand, is 6'2", which means if we're going to be doing something like dancing, I need all the help I can get. I have a great pair of 3" black strappy sandals that I wear for most fancy occasions, and I've taken a couple looks at Zappos and Piperlime to see what similar things I can find in white (that would be not much, at least, not in my preferred price range).

But after going dress shopping with my mom and sister last month, I realized how important it really is going to be for me to find shoes before I settle on a dress. A lot of dresses come in a few lengths that you can choose from, and I'm pretty sure I'm going to end up with a dress that doesn't have a lot of room for length alterations -- that is, dresses without waistlines where waists can be pulled up, and with detail at the hem, so skirts can't be cut at the bottom. So I need the tallest shoes I can find and then the shortest-available dress I can find.

The dress that -- at this point, anyway -- I'm pretty sure I'm going to buy (I wrote the post about dress shopping, but I'm not going to post it yet, because it's pretty ridiculous that I found it on the first day of shopping, only a few weeks after getting engaged) comes in lengths of 55", 58", and 61". My own hollow-to-hem length barefoot is 51" -- so I either need 4" heels or a shorter dress.

I haven't been impressed with the shoes I've seen in white so far, and if I really need to find the shoes first, I need to find them (relatively) soon. But you know what? When am I ever going to wear white shoes again? Probably never.

But look! Not all brides wear white shoes!


















Her feet look pretty damn cute in red. And this bride is on the prowl for red shoes as well. So silver is definitely a possibility (the dress I'm eyeing has silver embroidery). As is now purple, as well. Yay!

So as soon as all this surgery craziness is done with, I can start shopping for purple shoes :) And a venue, but you know... accessories first.

Purple is the new... pink?

If you know me at all, you know that purple is my favorite color. Because I was in charge of things back in high school, purple became my graduating class's color, as well. Never mind that the school colors were blue and white; every Homecoming week the Class of 1999 sported purple "P's" on their faces, and we girls found glittery purple eyeshadow to paint our eyelids with. The year I planned prom (junior year), everything was purple (and silver); our senior yearbook cover was purple, a fitting tribute to (I like to think) me. Among my two best friends from high school and I, we can pretty much count on the fact that purple anything will be a well-received gift.

So, of course, purple is a natural choice for my -- sorry, our -- wedding colors. After just a few weeks of casual (I promise! Only casual!) browsing through pictures of invitations and bridesmaid dresses, it's pretty clear that the mainstream wedding industry is not going to be easy to work with. Brides today are obsessed with pink -- usually in combination with brown -- and at best, I've found things in pale lavenders. Not horrible, but not ideal, either.

For instance, these invitations would be totally adorable in either a pale or vibrant purple, but it only comes in pink or blue:












So imagine my delight when I picked up a newspaper today at the grocery store and found this article in the Features section: The color purple: Fashion's bright idea for fall. I'm glad the fashion world has finally caught on, because purple is pretty much the best color in the world. It's slated to be popular this coming spring as well, so maybe the wedding world will catch on. The front-runner in this industry is J Crew, which has gorgeous wine-colored bridesmaid dresses in its fall collection:



















Ignore the astronomical prices of these dresses; maybe I can find them on clearance in December.

Purple is also my go-to makeup color. I have to say that purple eyeshadows complement my eyes and skin pretty damn well, and since I recently ran out of most of the purples in my makeup bag and had a day off last week (and because it's well-established that when I have a day off I like to go shopping), I somehow acquired a whole bunch of new purple eyeshadows:

Estee Lauder Pure Color eyeshadow in plum pop and rose confetti, part of a free gift-with-purchase (I bought a new eyeliner I've been lusting after ever since I got a sample in another free gift a couple years ago, in charcoal, and a lip gloss in tender berry):













Clinique Colour Surge Eye Shadow Trio in come heather, which I bought to get the Clinique gift-with-purchase:












And an eye shadow duo in mochaberry, which came in the free gift:








I probably should have thought about all my purchases a little more, because the come heather and Estee Lauder freebie are very similar, and the mochaberry is enough in that same color palette to take the place of either one, so if I had planned a little better I could have bought something else completely different instead. But that's OK, because these will all still get plenty of use, and they are all strong contenders for wedding-day makeup.

So here's hoping that other people start to think of purple the way I do, and that I have many more purplish things to choose from in the next year and a half. Although even if there aren't, I won't be too upset, because I already have strong intentions of designing our own invitations (wedding theme/motif is already decided on and is to be unveiled in a future post). All I really need are the purple bridesmaid dresses.

Name change?

In the four weeks we've been engaged, the three questions I've been asked most frequently are:
1. Have you picked a date?
2. Where are you going to get married?
3. Are you going to change your name?

The answers to 1 and 2 are May 2009, hopefully Memorial Weekend, somewhere in Louisville.

The answer to #3 is a bit more complicated, and I'm surprised by how often people ask me about it.

Growing up, I had mixed feelings about changing my name when I got married. I don't have a problem becoming Mrs. So-and-so, because I think it's ingrained enough in our society (and so many other societies) that it's a natural thing to do. I don't have a problem with women who keep their names either, but it's low down on my own feminist issues list. However, whenever I've imagined my name as a physician, I've always imagined becoming Dr. MaidenName, because when I was 12, I didn't have any other last name to put behind the title Doctor. So now I'm stuck. Do I become Dr. So-and-so or stick with Dr. MaidenName?

Right off the bat, I have to tell you that I don't like the idea of hyphenating. Especially not with our last names, which are both two syllables and eight letters long. What a pain for bubbling into Scantrons! I knew someone in high school whose parents combined their names to make a new family surname, and it worked pretty well, I guess mostly because I didn't know either of her parents before they were married so I didn't think it sounded weird. There are a couple iterations of combining our names that don't sound horrendous, but I'm still not a big fan of the idea. My paternal grandfather is really involved with our family genealogy (traceable back to 1635, when Isaac MaidenName came to Ipswich, MA), and I'm glad no one in the family changed their surname between then and now to make tracing our roots more difficult (although, yes, records of those things always exist). FH's (geez, am I really using these wedding abbreviations already?) family name is also easily recognizable as having come from a particular country/region, and I respect that as well, so I wouldn't want to combine our names into a new one and lose those heritages. Bottom line, it's just weird.

It used to be that it was very difficult to get your name changed on your medical license, so that women kept whichever last name they had when they graduated, to avoid licensing hassles. I don't think this is as much of a problem now, but I'm not sure. I've also heard the argument that it is very difficult for female physicians to re-establish themselves if they change their names. Thus, if they begin their careers as Dr. MaidenName and then get married and become Dr. So-and-so, they tend to lose a lot of peripheral referrals and professional contacts. Similarly, women who start out as Dr. So-and-so and then get divorced often keep their former husband's last name for the sake of their practices. So I used to say that if my career had gotten off the ground by the time I got married, that would be reason enough to keep my maiden name professionally. Needless to say, I never did publish my master's thesis, and even if I had, I'm sure no one would be looking it up on PubMed and trying to correlate it with my future publications, so that argument is out.

In all likelihood, I will graduate from medical school before we get married, so that might be argument enough to keep my maiden name professionally, but in reality, I probably will not have applied for my medical license by the time I get married, so there would still be time to make a change if I wanted to. And if I did change my name, right after graduation would be a perfect time to do it, because I would be known as Dr. So-and-so beginning with my first hospital. (And obviously, I'm not planning on getting divorced.)

In the setting of the field of medicine I think there are other factors to consider. My friend, an internal medicine intern getting married to another medicine intern in April, says she is going to change her name so that people always know that her hot husband is married to her, another physician working in the same hospital, who hears the same gossip everyone else does. This will decrease any chance that a nurse might try to make a move on him, thinking that his wife would never know. OK, that's a little silly, but it is nice to instantaneously tie yourself personally and professionally to a colleague by way of the same name. "I just met Dr. Tim Williams. Is he by any chance married to Dr. Jennifer Williams in medicine? That's what I thought!"

On the other hand, two Dr. Williams can create confusion. "Do you mean Dr. Williams the internist or Dr. Williams the gastroenterologist?" (This often happens with father/son physicians. "Dr. Johnson-the-ENT senior or junior?") At my school, we refer to "Dr. Mr. Lastname" vs. "Dr. Mrs. Lastname." In any case, I don't need to worry about this, because FH is not going to be a physician.

But what if FH becomes a Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative reporter or White House correspondent, and I actually do run for public office? Is there any sense in keeping our names different just to make it that much harder for nosy people to link us together? Probably not. It will still be pretty obvious that we're married, so what does it matter which names we have? And any potential conflict of interest posed by the fact that I'm a politician and he's in journalism would have to be addressed regardless of our names, so it's a moot point. (This paragraph is a little facetious. I talk a lot about running for public office someday, but I really don't know if that's a serious threat or not.)

A lot of women move their maiden name to their middle name when they take their husband's last name, but I don't really like the idea of that, either. It works well when your given middle name is just another "regular" name without any family meaning, but my maiden name is my mother's maiden name, and I am one of the few people who can pass it on (I have one male cousin who will be passing on the name to his children, but that's it). It also ties me to that side of my heritage, so I don't want to give it up (it's essentially the only proof I have of being half-Chinese, because I don't look it at all!). So making my maiden name my middle name is out of the question. And so is having two middle names; let's not be ridiculous, people.

Now, in case you're wondering, I definitely want our kids to have their father's last name. I don't have a good argument for or against it, but it just seems right to me. So then do I want to be the only one in the family without the same last name and be left out? Probably not.

So I think I've come up with a solution. I'm going to be Dr. MaidenName, which has been my goal and dream for 26 (by then, 28) years. But socially, I'll be Mrs. So-and-so, and introduce myself that way. Letters can come addressed to Mr. and Mrs. So-and-so (or Mr. So-and-so and Dr. MaidenName if the addressers feel so inclined). Our kids' friends can call me Mrs. So-and-so when they come over to our house. But most importantly, if people mix things up and call me Dr. So-and-so or Mrs. MaidenName at cocktail parties, I won't throw a fit about it, because that's the most annoying thing about women who keep their names.

The only weird thing about this is that essentially, for all intents and purposes, I am simply keeping my maiden name from a legal standpoint, so mortgages and bank statements will have to be in my maiden name, right? I'm making only a very tiny concession to FH and taking his name in the weakest way possible -- that is, socially but not legally. I know there are women who keep their maiden name professionally but legally assume their husband's last name for all other aspects of life, but due to the nature of my profession I don't think I can do this.

I've posed this solution to FH a few times over the last few years, and again in the last four weeks, and I think he's OK with it. He's not adamantly against it, anyway. I'm not sure if I should accept his OK-ness and not bring it up again, or if I should keep pestering him for his real feelings.

I'm going to be brave and open this topic up for your comments, but there are no guarantees that I will listen to any of them. :) So, what do you think?